Scope: within one deliverable class, which correction reasons recur under the same instruction and criteria? Choose a complete monthly cohort and retain accepted, corrected, rejected, cancelled, and open work. Define corrections against stated criteria.
Methodology: preserve submission, instruction version, criterion, reviewer note, category, resubmission, and disposition. Train a codebook, double-code a held-out subset, and report counts while retaining consequential rare cases.
GAO and NIST inform monitoring and records; ILO provides remote-work context. They establish no defect threshold, prove no intent, and show no geographic cause.
Inference limits and limitations: reviewer inconsistency, changing instructions, task mix, coaching, and repeated contributors confound patterns. Recurrence is not proof of performance; test a clearer source, example, or boundary later.