Scope: can an authorized reviewer reconstruct a Filipino admin handoff from the approved repository alone? Select one lane, a consecutive sample, and five required facts; include ordinary, corrected, waiting, and exceptional records.
Methodology: ask reviewers to identify the request, source, completed action, uncertainty, and next owner. Record correctness, elapsed time, extra access, and questions. Blind worker identity where practical and double-code disputed results.
GAO supports documentation, ILO supplies home-work context, and the World Bank addresses data use. None measures Filipino administrators, sets a retrieval threshold, or explains missing records by geography.
Inference limits and limitations: familiarity, permissions, indexing, complexity, and training confound results. A small single-lane sample cannot generalize. Report rubric, exclusions, reviewer context, disagreement, and missing data.